Comparison

Vettd vs Greptile
which one fits your workflow?

Greptile is an AI code reviewer with deep repo context. It indexes your full codebase so reviews understand inter-file relationships, conventions, and prior decisions. Pricing is per-seat with 50 reviews included; reviews beyond that are $1 each. Like CodeRabbit, it does not audit the deployed website.

Try Vettd free Visit Greptile

TL;DR

Pick Greptile if

  • You have a large monorepo and want code reviews that genuinely understand the whole codebase, not just the diff.
  • You're already on a per-seat budget and 50 reviews per seat per month is enough headroom.
  • You need enterprise primitives: SOC 2, SSO/SAML, custom DPA, self-hosting, dedicated Slack support.
  • You want a forward-deployed engineer to onboard your team.

Pick Vettd if

  • You're reviewing AI-generated code on small-to-medium projects, not 500k-line monorepos — Greptile's repo-wide context is overkill and overpriced.
  • You want to audit the live deployed site too, not just the source code.
  • Your team size is small but you watch many projects (per-project pricing wins over per-seat).
  • You care about AI search readiness (AEO), legal compliance, and "looks done but isn't" completeness — none of which a code reviewer covers.
  • You want predictable pricing without per-review overage charges.

At a glance

Side by side, in one breath.

VettdThis site
Primary focus
AI-app production-readiness scanning (live site + code)
Pricing headline
Free Site Scan · $5 Fix Pack · Watch from $19/mo per project
Free tier
Full Site Scan, unlimited, no signup
Target audience
Vibe coders, indie devs, small teams shipping AI-built apps
Integrations
GitHub, MCP (Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf)
Greptile
Primary focus
AI code review with full-repo context
Pricing headline
$30/seat/mo + $1 per review past 50
Free tier
Free trial via signup (duration not stated)
Target audience
Engineering teams with large repositories
Integrations
GitHub, GitLab, MCP, Slack

Who picks which

A recommendation for your situation.

Solo indie dev shipping AI-built apps
One person, a few side projects, looking for production-readiness checks.
Pick Vettd

Greptile's differentiator is whole-repo context. On a 5k-line side project that doesn't matter — the AI already sees the whole repo in a single context window. Vettd Watch 1 ($19/mo) covers code review + Site Scan + AI QA on preview deploys for one project. Greptile starts at $30/seat/mo for code review only.

Startup engineering team (5-15 devs) on a moderate codebase
A few hundred thousand lines of code, mixed AI-assisted and hand-written.
Either works

If your code-review workflow is the bottleneck and your repo is genuinely complex enough that whole-repo context matters, Greptile ($150-450/mo for 5-15 seats) is the better fit. If you want to monitor live sites alongside code, Vettd Watch 5/10 ($49-99/mo) does both. Many teams run both — Greptile for the deepest code reviews, Vettd for site auditing + AEO + completeness.

Engineering team on a 1M+ line monorepo
Large codebase where context windows can't hold the whole repo; conventions matter; cross-file bugs are common.
Pick Greptile

This is exactly Greptile's sweet spot — repo indexing means reviews catch issues that span files, understand internal naming conventions, and reference past decisions. Vettd reviews each PR in isolation today. Pick Greptile; consider Vettd separately for the live-site audit layer.

Feature matrix

Every capability that matters, side by side.

28 rows across scanning, fixing, distribution, compliance, and team workflow.

FeatureVettdGreptile
Scanning
Pull request review with inline comments
Whole-repo context indexing
Greptile's flagship feature.
AST analysis on push
Dependency CVE scan (npm audit)
Partial
Live URL audit (real browser)
Web Vitals on the live site
AI-graded legal pages, headlines, screenshots
AI search readiness (AEO)
Public scan — no signup, no auth
Fixing
Inline fix suggestions on PRs
Custom context & learnings (team-specific rules)
Roadmap
Markdown export of fixes (paste into Claude/Cursor)
Generated patch attached per finding
Suggestions, not patches
Distribution
GitHub App
GitLab support
Roadmap
MCP server
Slack integration for review notifications
Roadmap
Embeddable status badge
Per-review pricing past included quota
Vettd has no per-review overage.
$1/review past 50/seat
Compliance & trust
SOC 2 reports
RoadmapYes (Enterprise)
SSO / SAML
RoadmapYes (Enterprise)
Custom DPA
Watch Custom on requestYes (Enterprise)
Self-hosting
Yes (Enterprise)
Forward-deployed engineer onboarding
Yes (Enterprise)
Team & workflow
Multi-org admin
Score history + trend graph per project
Partial
Email/Slack alerts on findings
Email; Slack on roadmap
Open source / startup discount

Pricing breakdown

Tier by tier, in your local currency unit.

Vettd
Site ScanFree
No signup, no API key
  • 82 production-readiness checks
  • Full result detail
  • Public report URL
  • Embeddable badge
Fix Pack$5
One-time, per scan
  • Auto-generated fixes
  • Markdown export for AI agents
  • Money-back if no real issue caught
Watch 1$19/mo
$15/mo billed annually
  • 1 monitored project
  • Code Review on every push
  • Weekly auto re-scan
  • AI QA on preview deploys
Watch 5$49/mo
$39/mo billed annually
  • 5 monitored projects
  • Everything in Watch 1
  • Per-project trend graphs
Watch 10$99/mo
$79/mo billed annually
  • 10 monitored projects
  • Everything in Watch 5
Greptile
Cloud$30/seat/mo
+ $1 per review past 50/seat
  • Unlimited repos and users
  • Custom context & learnings
  • MCP integration
  • Standard support
  • No SSO, no self-hosting, no SOC 2 access
EnterpriseCustom
  • Self-hosting available
  • SSO / SAML
  • Custom DPA
  • SOC 2 + other compliance reports
  • Dedicated Slack support
  • Forward-deployed engineer
  • Custom SLAs
  • GitHub Enterprise support

Architecture & trust

Where data goes, what's persisted, what compliance covers.

VettdGreptile
Source code retentionPulled, analyzed, discarded — not persistedIndexed and persisted (that's how repo context works)
Self-hostingNot availableAvailable on Enterprise
SOC 2RoadmapYes, on Enterprise
SSO / SAMLOn request (Watch Custom)Standard on Enterprise
Per-review pricing modelNo per-review fees — flat per-project$1/review past included quota

Migration & interop

How to move, or how to run both.

Switching from Greptile to Vettd

Greptile and Vettd live in different lanes more than they compete — Greptile is repo-aware code review, Vettd is the deployed-app audit + lightweight code review. The realistic migration is "are you getting enough value from Greptile to justify $30/seat/mo against your repo size?" If your repo is small enough that an LLM call already fits the relevant context in one shot, Greptile's differentiator doesn't apply. Trial Vettd's Code Review for 30 days; keep what works.

Running Greptile and Vettd side by side

Both can install as GitHub Apps with no conflict. Vettd will not coordinate with Greptile, so expect some duplicate findings on basic ESLint and security rules — that's a feature on the trust side (independent verification) and a noise issue on the inbox side. Most teams that run both use Greptile for PRs and Vettd for the live-site monitoring + AEO categories.

FAQ

Answers to the obvious follow-up questions.

Greptile claims "deep repo context" — does Vettd do this?+

Not in the same way. Greptile indexes your whole repository so reviews understand cross-file relationships, conventions, and architecture. Vettd reviews PRs in isolation today (with the full file context, but not the full repo). For large monorepos this is a real Greptile advantage. For typical small-to-medium codebases the practical difference is smaller than it sounds — modern context windows hold most repos.

How does the math work for a 10-person team?+

Greptile Cloud: 10 × $30 = $300/mo. With 50 reviews/seat included, that's 500 reviews/mo. If your team does more, add $1 per review beyond. Vettd Watch 10: $99/mo (or $79/mo annual) — covers 10 monitored projects regardless of team size, no per-review charges. The breakpoint depends on whether you're seat-heavy or project-heavy.

Can I run both?+

Yes. They install as independent GitHub Apps. Some teams use Greptile for repo-aware PR review and Vettd for the live-site audit, AEO checks, and completeness category — surfaces neither code reviewer addresses.

What does Vettd do that Greptile doesn't?+

Live URL auditing with a real browser (82 checks across security, SEO, performance, legal, CRO, reliability, completeness, AI search readiness). AI-graded legal pages, headlines, and screenshot CRO. Public scans with no signup. Markdown export of fixes for AI agents. An embeddable status badge.

What does Greptile do that Vettd doesn't?+

Whole-repo indexing, custom team-specific learnings, SOC 2 / SSO / self-hosting, forward-deployed engineer onboarding. If you need any of those, pick Greptile or run both.

Are the per-review charges a real cost driver?+

Depends on review volume. 50 reviews/seat/mo is generous for most teams but can run thin if you have a high-PR-velocity culture (say, 5+ devs each merging multiple times daily). Vettd doesn't meter reviews — flat per-project pricing — so heavy-usage teams find Vettd more predictable.

Other comparisons

Vettd vs CodeRabbit Vettd vs Sourcery Vettd vs DeepSource Vettd vs Codacy Vettd vs SonarQube Cloud Vettd vs Lighthouse Vettd vs PageLens Vettd vs Snyk

Try Vettd against your own site.

Free Site Scan, no signup. 30 seconds. 82 production-readiness checks.

Run a free scan Connect a repository